Characters, plot threads, arcs, and narrators remain available as evidence-rich tables below the score summary.
Scan and inspect
Scene Profile
Read the numeric shape of one selected scene at a glance, then open the full supporting rationale for the metric that needs attention.
Scores first, evidence on demand
A compact profile without a wall of explanation.
The Scene Profile is a scanning workspace. Metric names, numeric observations, and compact visual position remain visible. Each generated rationale stays collapsed until the author asks for it, preserving the complete explanation without reserving permanent vertical space.
- Four Scene Writing observations form a two-column block at ordinary desktop widths.
- Two Draft Signals share the next row.
- Every disclosure names the metric and score for assistive technology.
- Native keyboard controls open and close one rationale at a time.
- Evidence-rich sections remain available below the compact score summary.
The door she doesn’t open
Generated observations · current
How the scene reads now
Open a metric for its complete supporting rationale.
Voice consistency8.2Show rationale
The scene sustains the narrator’s established compression and observational distance, including during the final exchange where the emotional pressure increases.
POV legibility7.6Show rationale
The perceiving consciousness remains clear through most of the scene. One mid-scene description briefly loosens the connection between the observed detail and Mara’s perspective.
Pacing6.9Show rationale
The scene builds steadily through the approach and hesitation, then holds on the unopened door long enough to make the refusal feel intentional rather than delayed.
Coherence8.5Show rationale
The scene’s physical actions, spoken exchange, and final choice form one continuous causal line. The recurring key image connects the opening and closing beats.
Where attention may be useful
Thread cueing5.8Show rationale
The scene advances the missing-ledger thread through the locked room, but the earlier promise associated with the brass key is only indirectly recalled.
Knowledge integrity7.1Show rationale
Mara’s inference is supported by what she has witnessed in prior chronology. Theo’s final remark may imply access to one detail not yet established for him.
Reader learning, character learning, and configured changes remain intact.